AJCC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Critical Care. 2002;11: 467-473

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Welton, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Jarr, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Welton, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Jarr, S.

Outcomes of and Resource Consumption by High-Cost Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

By John M. Welton, RN, PhD, Anthony A. Meyer, MD, PhD, Larry Mandelkehr, MBA, Samir M. Fakhry, MD and Sandra Jarr, RN, MSN. From the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, College of Nursing (JMW), the University of North Carolina, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC (AAM), Inova Health Systems, Fairfax, VA (SF), and University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC (LM, SJ).

Background Care of patients in an intensive care unit is among the most costly in hospitals. Little is known about high-cost patients within the intensive care unit or their outcomes of care.

Objectives To examine outcomes of and resource consumption by high-cost adult patients who received care in an intensive care unit at an academic medical center.

Methods Data on patients admitted during the period January 1, 1995, through June 30, 1999, were analyzed retrospectively. An intensive care unit database, the hospital discharge data set, and a cost-accounting data set were used to determine the total intensive care unit cost for the hospitalization. Patients were then stratified into cost deciles. Hospital and intensive care unit outcomes for patients in the top decile were compared with those of patients in the other deciles.

Results Cost data were available on 10606 of the 11244 patients who received care in an intensive care unit. Patients in the top decile accounted for 48.7% of all intensive care unit costs, and 67.6% of this group survived to discharge despite prolonged care. Patients transferred from an outside hospital were more likely to be in the top decile, have a longer stay in the intensive care unit, or die than were the other patients.

Conclusions A small group of patients accounts for a disproportionately higher amount of intensive care unit resources but has a relatively high survival rate. This cohort should be treated as an intact group that is not amenable to traditional cost-cutting measures.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
K. Guentner, L. A. Hoffman, M. B. Happ, Y. Kim, A. D. Dabbs, A. B. Mendelsohn, and L. Chelluri
Preferences for Mechanical Ventilation Among Survivors of Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation and Tracheostomy
Am. J. Crit. Care., January 1, 2006; 15(1): 65 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin Nurs ResHome page
C. Winkelman and B. Maloney
Obese ICU Patients: Resource Utilization and Outcomes
Clin Nurs Res, November 1, 2005; 14(4): 303 - 323.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.