HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Respond to This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Take the CE Test Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hendrich, A. L. Articles by Sorrells, A. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hendrich, A. L. Articles by Sorrells, A. K.

CE Online

Effects of Acuity-Adaptable Rooms on Flow of Patients and Delivery of Care

• Background Delayed transfers of patients between nursing units and lack of available beds are significant problems that increase costs and decrease quality of care and satisfaction among patients and staff.

• Objective To test whether use of acuity-adaptable rooms helps solve problems with transfers of patients, satisfaction levels, and medical errors.

• Methods A pre-post method was used to compare the effects of environmental design on various clinical and financial measures. Twelve outcome-based questions were formulated as the basis for inquiry. Two years of baseline data were collected before the unit moved and were compared with 3 years of data collected after the move.

• Results Significant improvements in quality and operational cost occurred after the move, including a large reduction in clinician handoffs and transfers; reductions in medication error and patient fall indexes; improvements in predictive indicators of patients’ satisfaction; decrease in budgeted nursing hours per patient day and increased available nursing time for direct care without added cost; increase in patient days per bed, with a smaller bed base (number of beds per patient days). Some staff turnover occurred during the first year; turnover stabilized thereafter.

• Conclusions Data in 5 key areas (flow of patients and hospital capacity, patients’ dissatisfaction, sentinel events, mean length of stay, and allocation of nursing productivity) appear to be sufficient to test the business case for future investment in partial or complete replication of this model with appropriate populations of patients.

To receive CE credit for this article, visit the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses’ (AACN) Web site at http://www.aacn.org, click on "Education" and select "Continuing Education," or call AACN’s Fax on Demand at (800) 222–6329 and request item No. 1173.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Chaudhury, A. Mahmood, and M. Valente The Effect of Environmental Design on Reducing Nursing Errors and Increasing Efficiency in Acute Care Settings: A Review and Analysis of the Literature Environment and Behavior, November 1, 2009; 41(6): 755 - 786. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. E. Detsky and E. Etchells Single-Patient Rooms for Safe Patient-Centered Hospitals JAMA, August 27, 2008; 300(8): 954 - 956. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Pati, T. Harvey, and C. Cason Inpatient Unit Flexibility: Design Characteristics of a Successful Flexible Unit Environment and Behavior, March 1, 2008; 40(2): 205 - 232. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. B. Hassmiller and M. Cozine Addressing The Nurse Shortage To Improve The Quality Of Patient Care Health Aff., January 1, 2006; 25(1): 268 - 274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Matukaitis, P. Stillman, E. Wykpisz, and E. Ewen Appropriate Admissions to the Appropriate Unit: A Decision Tree Approach American Journal of Medical Quality, March 1, 2005; 20(2): 90 - 97. [Abstract] [PDF]