AJCC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Critical Care. 2004;13: 126-136
Copyright © 2004 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Take the CE Test
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gélinas, C.
Right arrow Articles by Puntillo, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gélinas, C.
Right arrow Articles by Puntillo, K.

Pain Assessment and Management in Critically Ill Intubated Patients: a Retrospective Study

By Céline Gélinas, RN, MSc, Martine Fortier, BA, Chantal Viens, RN, PhD, Lise Fillion, RN, PhD and Kathleen Puntillo, RN, DNSc. From Faculty of Nursing, University Laval, Quebec City, Quebec (CG, MF, CV, LF), and Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, Calif (KP).

Background Little research has been done on pain assessment in critical care, especially in patients who cannot communicate verbally.

Objectives To describe (1) pain indicators used by nurses and physicians for pain assessment, (2) pain management (pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions) undertaken by nurses to relieve pain, and (3) pain indicators used for pain reassessment by nurses to verify the effectiveness of pain management in patients who are intubated.

Methods Medical files from 2 specialized healthcare centers in Quebec City, Quebec, were reviewed. A data collection instrument based on Melzack’s theory was developed from existing tools. Pain-related indicators were clustered into nonobservable/subjective (patients’ self-reports of pain) and observable/objective (physiological and behavioral) categories.

Results A total of 183 pain episodes in 52 patients who received mechanical ventilation were analyzed. Observable indicators were recorded 97% of the time. Patients’ self-reports of pain were recorded only 29% of the time, a practice contradictory to recommendations for pain assessment. Pharmacological interventions were used more often (89% of the time) than nonpharmacological interventions (<25%) for managing pain. Almost 40% of the time, pain was not reassessed after an intervention. For reassessments, observable indicators were recorded 66% of the time; patients self-reports were recorded only 8% of the time.

Conclusions Pain documentation in medical files is incomplete or inadequate. The lack of a pain assessment tool may contribute to this situation. Research is still needed in the development of tools to enhance pain assessment in critically ill intubated patients.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crit Care NurseHome page
A. M. Kabes, J. K. Graves, and J. Norris
Further Validation of the Nonverbal Pain Scale in Intensive Care Patients
Crit. Care Nurse, February 1, 2009; 29(1): 59 - 66.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crit Care NurseHome page
J. E. Helms and C. P. Barone
Physiology and Treatment of Pain
Crit. Care Nurse, December 1, 2008; 28(6): 38 - 49.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
C. Gelinas, L. Fillion, K. A. Puntillo, C. Viens, and M. Fortier
Validation of the critical-care pain observation tool in adult patients.
Am. J. Crit. Care., July 1, 2006; 15(4): 420 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crit Care NurseHome page
D. Li and K. Puntillo
What is the current evidence on pain and sedation assessment in nonresponsive patients in the intensive care unit?
Crit. Care Nurse, October 1, 2004; 24(5): 68 - 3.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.