AJCC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Critical Care. 2004;13: 146-152

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McKinley, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lovas, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McKinley, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lovas, J.

Assessment of Anxiety in Intensive Care Patients By Using the Faces Anxiety Scale

By Sharon McKinley, RN, PhD, Jane Stein-Parbury, RN, MEd, PhD, Afsaneh Chehelnabi, BMed and Judy Lovas, BA, MSc. From University of Technology Sydney (SM, JS-P, AC, JL) and Royal North Shore Hospital (SM, AC, JL), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Background Anxiety is difficult to detect in patients receiving mechanical ventilation because clinical signs are confounded and patients often cannot respond to validated anxiety measures. Most patients can respond to the single-item Faces Anxiety Scale.

Objectives To assess the validity of the Faces Anxiety Scale, the frequency and severity of state anxiety, and correlates of anxiety in intensive care patients.

Methods A research assistant made a single clinical judgment of anxiety in the range of 1 to 10 on the basis of patients’ nonverbal responses (ie, nods) to 9 questions about mood and their physical and behavioral signs. Patients then responded to the Faces Anxiety Scale. Demographic, clinical, and pharmacological data were obtained from the patients’ charts.

Results Mean age of the 106 patients was 61 years; 62% were men. Admission diagnoses were cardiovascular in 26% of patients, respiratory in 26%, trauma in 18%, neurological in 12%, gastrointestinal in 12%, and other in 6%. At the time of anxiety assessment, 89% were receiving mechanical ventilation. The correlation between patients’ self-reports of anxiety on the Anxiety Faces Scale and the research assistant’s assessments was 0.64 (P < .001). Some anxiety was reported by 85% of patients (mean level 2.9; SD 1.2). Anxiety levels were lower in patients who had recently received sedatives or opioids but were not related to heart rate or blood pressure.

Conclusions The Faces Anxiety Scale is a valid means of measuring anxiety in intensive care patients. Anxiety is common in these patients and is often moderate to severe.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
M. M. J. De Jong, S. M. Burns, M. L. Campbell, M. Chulay, M. J. Grap, L. N.B. Pierce, and T. Simpson
Development of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses' Sedation Assessment Scale for Critically Ill Patients
Am. J. Crit. Care., November 1, 2005; 14(6): 531 - 544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.