HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Respond to This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Take the CE Test Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Happ, M. B. Articles by Kitutu, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Happ, M. B. Articles by Kitutu, J.

CE Article

COMMUNICATION ABILITY, METHOD, AND CONTENT AMONG NONSPEAKING NONSURVIVING PATIENTS TREATED WITH MECHANICAL VENTILATION IN THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT

• Objective To describe the communication ability, methods, and content among nonspeaking nonsurviving patients treated with mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit.

• Methods Fifty patients who received mechanical ventilation and died during hospitalization were randomly selected from all adult patients (N = 396) treated in 8 ICUs in a tertiary medical center during a 12-month period. Clinicians’ notes, use of physical restraints, and medication records were reviewed retrospectively. Data on communication method, use of sedation/analgesia (within 4 hours of communication event), and use of physical restraints were recorded on an investigator-developed communication event record for the first 10 communication episodes documented in each patient’s record (n = 275). Message content and method were recorded for every documented communication episode (n = 694), resulting in a total of 812 content and 771 method data codes.

• Results Most charts (72%) had documentation of communication by patients at some time during mechanical ventilation. Most documented communication exchanges were between patients and nurses. Primary methods of communication were head nods, mouthing words, gesture, and writing. Physical restraints were used in half of the patients. However, most of the documented communication episodes (127/202, 62.9%) occurred when physical restraints were not in use. Communication content was primarily related to pain, symptoms, feelings, and physical needs. Patients also initiated communication about their homes, families, and conditions.

• Conclusions A clinically significant proportion of nonsurviving patients treated with mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit communicate to nurses, other clinicians, and family members primarily through gesture, head nods, and mouthing words.

Notice to CE enrollees: A closed-book, multiple-choice examination following this article tests your understanding of the following objectives: Identify factors influencing communication ability of nonspeaking patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) who are receiving mechanical ventilation Discuss the primary methods of communication used by nonspeaking patients in the ICU who are receiving mechanical ventilation Describe the content of communication of patients in the ICU who are receiving mechanical ventilation

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. O'Shea Forbes Prolonged Ventilator Dependence: Perspective of the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patient Clin Nurs Res, August 1, 2007; 16(3): 231 - 250. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Li and K. Puntillo What is the current evidence on pain and sedation assessment in nonresponsive patients in the intensive care unit? Crit. Care Nurse, October 1, 2004; 24(5): 68 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF]