|
|
||||||||
Background Underfeeding of patients reliant on enteral tube feedings most likely is due primarily to interruptions in the infusions. Strategies to improve energy intake require an understanding of such interruptions and associated outcomes.
Objectives To compare daily energy intake with goal energy intake; to ascertain frequency, duration, and reasons for interruptions in feedings; and to determine occurrences of feeding intolerance.
Methods A prospective, descriptive study of a convenience sample of patients admitted during a 3-month period to a medical intensive care unit. Patients were included who were expected to receive continuous enteral tube feedings for at least 48 hours. Patients were studied until discontinuation of feedings, discharge from the unit, or death.
Results Thirty-nine patients were studied for 276 feeding days. Patients received a mean of 64% of goal energy intake. Mean length of interruptions in feeding was 5.23 hours per patient per day. Interruptions for performance of tests and procedures accounted for 35.7% of the total cessation in feeding time. Next most time-consuming interruptions occurred with changes in body position (15%), unstable clinical conditions (13.5%), high gastric residual volume (11.5%), and nausea and vomiting (9.2%). Patients had diarrhea 105 (38%) of 276 feeding days. Gastric residual volumes exceeded 150 mL on 28 measurements in 11 patients. Five patients experienced episodes of nausea and vomiting. Four patients experienced an episode of feeding aspiration.
Conclusions Precautionary interruptions in enteral feedings to decrease presumed risk of aspiration occurred frequently and resulted in underfeeding. Episodes of vomiting and of aspiration were uncommon.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Manojlovich, C. L. Antonakos, and D. L. Ronis Intensive Care Units, Communication Between Nurses and Physicians, and Patients' Outcomes Am. J. Crit. Care., January 1, 2009; 18(1): 21 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Metheny, L. Schallom, D. A. Oliver, and R. E. Clouse Gastric Residual Volume and Aspiration in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Gastric Feedings Am. J. Crit. Care., November 1, 2008; 17(6): 512 - 519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. O'Meara, E. Mireles-Cabodevila, F. Frame, A. C. Hummell, J. Hammel, R. A. Dweik, and A. C. Arroliga Evaluation of Delivery of Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation Am. J. Crit. Care., January 1, 2008; 17(1): 53 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Metheny Residual Volume Measurement Should Be Retained in Enteral Feeding Protocols Am. J. Crit. Care., January 1, 2008; 17(1): 62 - 64. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Bourgault, L. Ipe, J. Weaver, S. Swartz, and P. J. O'Dea Development of Evidence-Based Guidelines and Critical Care Nurses ' Knowledge of Enteral Feeding Crit. Care Nurse, August 1, 2007; 27(4): 17 - 29. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Metheny Preventing respiratory complications of tube feedings: evidence-based practice. Am. J. Crit. Care., July 1, 2006; 15(4): 360 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Artinian, H. Krayem, and B. DiGiovine Effects of early enteral feeding on the outcome of critically ill mechanically ventilated medical patients. Chest, April 1, 2006; 129(4): 960 - 967. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. O'Leary-Kelley, K. A. Puntillo, J. Barr, N. Stotts, and M. K. Douglas Nutritional Adequacy in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation Who Are Fed Enterally Am. J. Crit. Care., May 1, 2005; 14(3): 222 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Metheny, J. Stewart, G. Nuetzel, D. Oliver, and R. E. Clouse Effect of Feeding-Tube Properties on Residual Volume Measurements in Tube-Fed Patients JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, May 1, 2005; 29(3): 192 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |