AJCC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

American Journal of Critical Care. 2004;13: 480-488
Copyright © 2004 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoffman, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Tasota, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoffman, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Tasota, F. J.

Perceptions of Physicians, Nurses, and Respiratory Therapists About the Role of Acute Care Nurse Practitioners

By Leslie A. Hoffman, RN, PhD, Mary Beth Happ, RN, PhD, Carmella Scharfenberg, RN, MSN, Dana DiVirgilio-Thomas, BA and Frederick J. Tasota, RN, MSN. From the University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, Pa.

• Background Information about the contributions of acute care nurse practitioners to medical management teams in critical care settings is limited.

• Objective To examine contributions of acute care nurse practitioners to medical management of critically ill patients from the perspectives of 3 disciplines: medicine, respiratory care, and nursing.

• Methods Attending physicians, respiratory therapists, and nurses in 2 intensive care units were asked to list 3 advantages and 3 disadvantages of collaborative care provided by acute care nurse practitioners. Qualitative methods (coding/constant comparative analysis) were used to identify common themes and subthemes. Overall response rate was 35% (from 69% for attending physicians to 26% for nurses).

• Results Responses were grouped into 4 main themes: accessibility, competence/knowledge, care coordination/communication, and system issues. Acute care nurse practitioners were valued for their accessibility, expertise in routine daily management of patients, and ability to meet patient/family needs, especially for "long-stay" patients. Also, they were respected for their commitment to providing quality care and for their communication skills, exemplified through teaching of nursing staff, patient/family involvement, and fluency in weaning protocols. Physicians valued acute care nurse practitioners’ continuity of care, patient/family focus, and commitment. Nurses valued their accessibility, commitment, and patient/family focus. Respiratory therapists valued their accessibility, commitment, and consistency in implementing weaning protocols.

• Conclusion Responses reflected unique advantages of acute care nurse practitioners as members of medical management teams in critical care settings. Despite perceptions of the acute care nurse practitioner’s role as medically oriented, the themes reflect a clear nursing focus.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Crit Care NurseHome page
S. Yeager, K. D. Shaw, J. Casavant, and S. M. Burns
An acute care nurse practitioner model of care for neurosurgical patients.
Crit. Care Nurse, December 1, 2006; 26(6): 57 - 64.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Crit CareHome page
R. M. Kleinpell
Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Practice: Results of a 5-Year Longitudinal Study
Am. J. Crit. Care., May 1, 2005; 14(3): 211 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.