HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Respond to This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Take the CE Test Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hoffman, L. A. Articles by Donahoe, M. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hoffman, L. A. Articles by Donahoe, M. P.

CE Article

Outcomes of Care Managed by an Acute Care Nurse Practitioner/Attending Physician Team in a Subacute Medical Intensive Care Unit

• Background Many academic medical centers employ nurse practitioners as substitutes to provide care normally supplied by house staff.

• Objective To compare outcomes in a subacute medical intensive care unit of patients managed by a team consisting of either an acute care nurse practitioner and an attending physician or an attending physician and critical care/pulmonary fellows.

• Methods During a 31-month period, in 7-month blocks of time, 526 consecutive patients admitted to the unit for more than 24 hours were managed by one or the other of the teams. Patients managed by the 2 teams were compared for a variety of outcomes.

• Results Patients managed by the 2 teams did not differ significantly for any workload, demographic, or medical condition variable. The patients also did not differ in readmission to the high acuity unit (P = .25) or subacute unit (P = .44) within 72 hours of discharge or in mortality with (P = .25) or without (P = .89) treatment limitations. Among patients who had multiple weaning trials, patients managed by the 2 teams did not differ in length of stay in the subacute unit (P = .42), duration of mechanical ventilation (P = .18), weaning status at time of discharge from the unit (P = .80), or disposition (P = .28). Acute Physiology Scores were significantly different over time (P = .046). Patients managed by the fellows had more reintubations (P=.02).

• Conclusions In a subacute intensive care unit, management by the 2 teams produced equivalent outcomes.

Notice to CE enrollees: A closed-book, multiple-choice examination following this article tests your understanding of the following objectives: Explain the role of the acute care nurse practitioner/attending physician team in providing care in a subacute medical intensive care unit Identify the 3 main outcome measures in the study Discuss the limitations of the study

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Nevidjon, P. Rieger, C. Miller Murphy, M. Q. Rosenzweig, M. R. McCorkle, and K. Baileys Filling the Gap: Development of the Oncology Nurse Practitioner Workforce J. Oncol. Pract, January 1, 2010; 6(1): 2 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Q. Rosenzweig The Oncology Nurse Practitioner: A Unique Provider for the Follow-Up for Early-Stage Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2006; 24(22): 3710 - 3711. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Kleinpell Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Practice: Results of a 5-Year Longitudinal Study Am. J. Crit. Care., May 1, 2005; 14(3): 211 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]