HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Respond to This Article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cutler, C. J. Articles by Davis, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cutler, C. J. Articles by Davis, N.

Improving Oral Care in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation

• Background Comprehensive oral care is an evidence-based prevention strategy to reduce the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Until recently, no comprehensive guidelines or standards existed to define necessary tasks, methods, and frequency of oral care to provide patients with optimal results.

• Objectives To observe current practice of, define best practice for, and measure compliance with standardized comprehensive oral care.

• Methods This observational study was part of a larger research study performed at 5 acute care hospitals. Time blocks of 4 hours were randomized over 8 intensive care units and the 7 days of the week. Baseline data were collected before implementation of multifaceted education on an oral-cleansing protocol; interventional data were collected afterward.

• Results Oral care practices were observed for 253 patients. During the baseline period, oral cleansing was primarily via suction swabs. Toothbrushing and moisturizing of the oral tissues were not observed. Only 32% of the patients had suctioning to manage oral secretions. During the interventional period, 33% of patients had their teeth brushed, 65% had swab cleansing, and 63% had a moisturizer applied to the oral mucosal tissues. A total of 61% had management of oral secretions; 38% had oropharyngeal suctioning via a special catheter.

• Conclusions Implementation of an evidence-based oral cleansing protocol improved the care of patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Multifaceted education and implementation strategies motivated staff to increase oral care practices.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. M. Berry, P. M. Davidson, J. Masters, and K. Rolls Systematic Literature Review of Oral Hygiene Practices for Intensive Care Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation Am. J. Crit. Care., November 1, 2007; 16(6): 552 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. F. Tolentino-DelosReyes, S. D. Ruppert, and S.-Y. P. K. Shiao Evidence-Based Practice: Use of the Ventilator Bundle to Prevent Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Am. J. Crit. Care., January 1, 2007; 16(1): 20 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. L. Cason, T. Tyner, S. Saunders, and L. Broome Nurses' Implementation of Guidelines for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Am. J. Crit. Care., January 1, 2007; 16(1): 28 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]