AJCC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Critical Care. 2005;14: 404-415

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Take the CE Test
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tracy, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Berman, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tracy, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Berman, B.

CE Article and Journal Club Feature

Use of Complementary and Alternative Therapies: A National Survey of Critical Care Nurses

By Mary Fran Tracy, RN, PhD, CCRN, CCNS, Ruth Lindquist, RN, PhD, APRN, BC, Kay Savik, MS, Shigeaki Watanuki, RN, PhD, Sue Sendelbach, RN, PhD, CCNS, Mary Jo Kreitzer, RN, PhD and Brian Berman, MD. From University of Minnesota Medical Center (MFT), University of Minnesota School of Nursing (MFT, RL, KS, MJK), Abbott Northwestern Hospital (SS), Minneapolis, Minn, AINO University, Osaka, Japan (SW), and University of Maryland, Baltimore, Md (BB).

Background Demand for complementary and alternative therapies is increasing and is affecting all healthcare settings, including critical care.

Methods A random sample of members of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses was surveyed to determine the members’ attitudes, knowledge, perspectives, and use of complementary and alternative therapies.

Results Most of the 726 respondents were using one or more complementary and alternative therapies in practice. The most common therapies used were diet, exercise, relaxation techniques, and prayer. A majority of the nurses had some knowledge of more than half of the 28 therapies listed on the survey, and a majority desired additional training for 25 therapies. Respondents generally required more evidence judged as essential to use or recommend conventional therapy than to use or recommend complementary and alternative therapies. Nurses viewed complementary and alternative therapies positively overall, were open to use of the therapies, and perceived them as legitimate and beneficial to patients. Nurses judged the therapies helpful for treatment of a variety of symptoms. A majority of nurses desired an increase in the availability of the therapies for patients, patients’ families, and nursing staff. Nurses’ professional use of the therapies was related to having more knowledge of them, perceiving benefits of them, total number of therapies they recommended to patients, personal use, and affiliation with a mainstream religion.

Conclusions Educational programs that provide information about use of complementary and alternative therapies and the underlying evidence base most likely will increase the appropriate use of the therapies to achieve desired outcomes.


 

Journal Club Article Discussion Points




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Holist NursHome page
K. G. Mellott, P. B. Sharp, and L. M. Anderson
Biobehavioral Measures in a Critical-Care Healing Environment
J Holist Nurs, June 1, 2008; 26(2): 128 - 135.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.