AJCC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Critical Care. 2006;15: 370-377

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aragon, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aragon, D.

Evaluation of Nursing Work Effort and Perceptions About Blood Glucose Testing in Tight Glycemic Control

By Daleen Aragon, RN, PhD, CCRN. From Advanced Practice Nursing and Research, Orlando Regional Healthcare, and Graduate School of Nursing, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Fla.

Background Tight glycemic control is important in critically ill patients and involves insulin infusions and monitoring of blood glucose levels. Hourly measurements of blood glucose levels and adjustments of intravenous insulin doses require additional work by nurses.

Objectives To evaluate the nursing work incurred with and nursing perceptions about tight glycemic control and blood glucose monitoring.

Methods A variety of intensive care units were studied. Surveys were used to gain information about nurses’ perceptions. Time-in-motion observations were used to determine the time taken to measure blood glucose levels and adjust insulin doses.

Results Nurses thought that tight glycemic control was important and that the work associated with it was substantial. Nurses thought that easier and automated forms of blood glucose monitoring are needed. They preferred using an arterial catheter to obtain blood samples to avoid excessive finger sticks. The total number of blood glucose measurements was 77 954. The mean time taken for hourly blood glucose monitoring and adjustment of insulin doses was 4.72 minutes. The estimated costs of time spent on glycemic control during a 1-year period were $182 488 for nurses’ salaries and $58 500 for supplies.

Conclusions Although most nurses endorse tight glycemic control, the work associated with it is burdensome and costly. Because up to 2 hours might be required for tight glycemic control for a single patient in a 24-hour period, the costs in time and money are high. Easier clinical methods for monitoring blood glucose levels are needed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. S. Wiener, D. C. Wiener, and R. J. Larson
Benefits and Risks of Tight Glucose Control in Critically Ill Adults: A Meta-analysis
JAMA, August 27, 2008; 300(8): 933 - 944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
M. A. Malesker, P. A. Foral, A. C. McPhillips, K. J. Christensen, J. A. Chang, and D. E. Hilleman
An Efficiency Evaluation of Protocols for Tight Glycemic Control in Intensive Care Units
Am. J. Crit. Care., November 1, 2007; 16(6): 589 - 598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
K. Dracup and C. W. Bryan-Brown
Evidence-based practice is wonderful ... Sort of.
Am. J. Crit. Care., July 1, 2006; 15(4): 356 - 358.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.