| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
• Background Tight glycemic control is important in critically ill patients and involves insulin infusions and monitoring of blood glucose levels. Hourly measurements of blood glucose levels and adjustments of intravenous insulin doses require additional work by nurses.
• Objectives To evaluate the nursing work incurred with and nursing perceptions about tight glycemic control and blood glucose monitoring.
• Methods A variety of intensive care units were studied. Surveys were used to gain information about nurses’ perceptions. Time-in-motion observations were used to determine the time taken to measure blood glucose levels and adjust insulin doses.
• Results Nurses thought that tight glycemic control was important and that the work associated with it was substantial. Nurses thought that easier and automated forms of blood glucose monitoring are needed. They preferred using an arterial catheter to obtain blood samples to avoid excessive finger sticks. The total number of blood glucose measurements was 77 954. The mean time taken for hourly blood glucose monitoring and adjustment of insulin doses was 4.72 minutes. The estimated costs of time spent on glycemic control during a 1-year period were $182 488 for nurses’ salaries and $58 500 for supplies.
• Conclusions Although most nurses endorse tight glycemic control, the work associated with it is burdensome and costly. Because up to 2 hours might be required for tight glycemic control for a single patient in a 24-hour period, the costs in time and money are high. Easier clinical methods for monitoring blood glucose levels are needed.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Akhtar, P. G. Barash, and S. E. Inzucchi Scientific Principles and Clinical Implications of Perioperative Glucose Regulation and Control Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2010; 110(2): 478 - 497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Shearer, M. Boehmer, M. Closs, R. Dela Rosa, J. Hamilton, K. Horton, R. McGrath, and C. Schulman Comparison of Glucose Point-of-Care Values With Laboratory Values in Critically Ill Patients Am. J. Crit. Care., May 1, 2009; 18(3): 224 - 230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Blaha, P. Kopecky, M. Matias, R. Hovorka, J. Kunstyr, T. Kotulak, M. Lips, D. Rubes, M. Stritesky, J. Lindner, et al. Comparison of Three Protocols for Tight Glycemic Control in Cardiac Surgery Patients Diabetes Care, May 1, 2009; 32(5): 757 - 761. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 The NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators Intensive versus Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients N. Engl. J. Med., March 26, 2009; 360(13): 1283 - 1297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Cook, D. Laughlin, M. Moore, D. North, K. Wilkins, G. Wong, A. Wallace-Scroggs, and L. Halvorsen Differences in Glucose Values Obtained From Point-of-Care Glucose Meters and Laboratory Analysis in Critically Ill Patients Am. J. Crit. Care., January 1, 2009; 18(1): 65 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. S. Wiener, D. C. Wiener, and R. J. Larson Benefits and Risks of Tight Glucose Control in Critically Ill Adults: A Meta-analysis JAMA, August 27, 2008; 300(8): 933 - 944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Malesker, P. A. Foral, A. C. McPhillips, K. J. Christensen, J. A. Chang, and D. E. Hilleman An Efficiency Evaluation of Protocols for Tight Glycemic Control in Intensive Care Units Am. J. Crit. Care., November 1, 2007; 16(6): 589 - 598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Dracup and C. W. Bryan-Brown Evidence-based practice is wonderful ... Sort of. Am. J. Crit. Care., July 1, 2006; 15(4): 356 - 358. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
