AJCC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Critical Care. 2006;15: 549-555
Copyright © 2006 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hatler, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Bedker, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hatler, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Bedker, D.

Journal Club Feature

Using Evidence and Process Improvement Strategies to Enhance Healthcare Outcomes for the Critically Ill: A Pilot Project

By Carol W. Hatler, RN, PhD, Deanna Mast, RN, MSHA, Jeannie Corderella, RN, BS, MHA, Gina Mitchell, RN, Kathleen Howard, RN, CIC, Jackie Aragon, RN, BSN, CPHQ and Deborah Bedker, RN, BSN, CPHQ. From the Departments of Nursing and Infection Control, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Ariz.

Corresponding author: Carol Hatler, RN, PhD, Director, Nursing Research, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, 350 W Thomas, Phoenix, AZ 85013 (e-mail: carol.hatler{at}chw.edu).

Background Although the value of evidence-based practice may seem obvious, the process needed to produce more effective delivery of evidence-based healthcare is not obvious. Furthermore, the continuing escalation of healthcare costs fuels the desire of providers and consumers to undertake only those treatments that have benefit. One way to effect necessary changes in healthcare organizations is through focused, interdisciplinary, collaborative projects related to evidence-based practice.

Objectives To reduce rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia and catheter-related bloodstream infection in patients in the medical intensive care unit of a large, urban tertiary referral hospital in the Southwest.

Methods The theory of planned behavior served as the basis for providing staff members with research-based, easily controllable strategies that "fit" with the usual methods of care delivery. Implementation of the strategies and data collection were accomplished through routine rounds on patients and regular reporting of objective information.

Results During a 15-month period, use of the selected strategies resulted in a 54% reduction in ventilator-associated pneumonia, a 78% reduction in catheter-related bloodstream infections, and a 18% reduction in mean length of stay in the unit. Use of a multidisciplinary, environmentally tailored approach to concerns about patients’ care resulted in estimated cost savings of $1.0 million to $2.3 million.

Conclusions Early, consistent communication about the project’s rationale, expected behavior, and outcomes enhanced the manageability and effectiveness of this change in an adult intensive care unit.


 

Journal Club Article Discussion Points




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crit Care NurseHome page
C. A. Rauen, M. Chulay, E. Bridges, K. M. Vollman, and R. Arbour
Seven Evidence-Based Practice Habits: Putting Some Sacred Cows Out to Pasture
Crit. Care Nurse, April 1, 2008; 28(2): 98 - 123.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.