AJCC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Critical Care. 2006;15: 556-566

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Take the CE Test
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenfeld, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosenfeld, A. G.

CE Article

State of the Heart: Building Science to Improve Women’s Cardiovascular Health

By Anne G. Rosenfeld, RN, PhD, CNS. From Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Ore.

Corresponding author: Anne G. Rosenfeld, RN, PhD, CNS, Associate Professor, School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, 3455 SW Veterans Hospital Rd, Portland, OR 97239 (e-mail: rosenfea{at}ohsu.edu).

Cardiovascular disease is the No. 1 killer of women in the United States, and marked disparities in cardiovascular health exist between women and men and among groups of women. Coronary heart disease is underdiagnosed, undertreated, and underresearched in women. Women with suspected heart disease are less likely than men to receive indicated diagnostic tests and procedures; sex-based biases in treatment of myocardial infarction persist; and women continue to be underrepresented in cardiovascular research. An accumulating body of literature points to 3 major explanations: sex-based physiology, provider bias, and psychosocial influences. Women’s acute and prodromal signs and symptoms of myocardial infarction have been described, yet women have difficulty recognizing and acting on these indications. Primary and secondary prevention of heart disease in women is imperative; although the science is lacking in several areas, existing evidence on diet, hormone therapy, aspirin, physical activity and obesity, and diabetes can serve as the basis for interventions. Potentially, large impacts could be made on women’s morbidity and mortality if current scientific knowledge were implemented. The state of the science of women and heart disease is reviewed, with a focus on those areas with the greatest potential to address the needs of women’s cardiovascular status. Key gaps in the science and remaining questions are presented as a research agenda for the coming decade.

Notice to CE enrollees:
A closed-book, multiple-choice examination following this article tests your understanding of the following objectives:
  1. Compare and contrast the prevention, diagnostic, and treatment needs of men and women with or at risk for heart disease.
  2. Describe the limitations associated with generalization and widespread application of cardiovascular research findings to date.
  3. Identify strategies for participation of nursing professionals in promoting primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women.

To read this article and take the CE test online, visit www.ajcconline.org and click "CE Articles in This Issue."







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.