AJCC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Critical Care. 2007;16: 536-543

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manojlovich, M.
Right arrow Articles by DeCicco, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Manojlovich, M.
Right arrow Articles by DeCicco, B.

Healthy Work Environments, Nurse-Physician Communication, and Patients’ Outcomes

By Milisa Manojlovich, RN, PhD, CCRN and Barry DeCicco, MS (Statistics), MS (Industrial Engineering). Milisa Manojlovich is an assistant professor in the School of Nursing, University of Michigan, and Barry DeCicco is a statistician staff specialist in the customer research section of the quality improvement department at the University of Michigan Hospitals and Health Centers, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Corresponding author: Dr Milisa Manojlovich, University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 N Ingalls, Room 4306, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0482 (e-mail: mmanojlo{at}umich.edu).

Background Adverse events and serious errors are common in critical care. Although factors in the work environment are important predictors of adverse outcomes for patients, communication between nurses and physicians may be the most significant factor associated with excess hospital mortality in critical care settings.

Objectives To examine the relationships between nurses’ perceptions of their practice environment, nurse-physician communication, and selected patients’ outcomes.

Methods A nonexperimental, descriptive design was used, and all nurses (N=866) working in 25 intensive care units in southeastern Michigan were surveyed. The Conditions for Work Effectiveness Questionnaire-II and the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index were used to measure characteristics of the work environment; the ICU Nurse-Physician Questionnaire was used to measure nurse-physician communication. Nurses self-rated the frequency of ventilator-associated pneumonia, catheter-related sepsis, and medication errors in patients under their care.

Results A total of 462 nurses (53%) responded. According to multilevel modeling, both practice environment scales accounted for 47% of the variance in nurse-physician communication scores (P=.001). Nurse-physician communication was predictive of nurse-assessed medication errors only (R2=0.11). Neither environment scale was predictive of any of the patient outcomes.

Conclusions Healthy work environments are important for nurse-physician communication. In intensive care units, characteristics of the work environment did not vary enough to be significantly predictive of outcomes, suggesting that even in various types of critical care units, characteristics of the work environment may be more similar than different.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crit Care NurseHome page
C. Schmalenberg and M. Kramer
Clinical Units With the Healthiest Work Environments
Crit. Care Nurse, June 1, 2008; 28(3): 65 - 77.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.