AJCC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

American Journal of Critical Care. 2008;17: 428-435
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in AJCC
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rose, L.
Right arrow Articles by Redl, L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rose, L.
Right arrow Articles by Redl, L.

Survey of Cuff Management Practices in Intensive Care Units in Australia and New Zealand

By Louise Rose, BN, ICU Cert, MN, PhD and Leanne Redl, BN, Grad Cert ICU. Louise Rose is the Lawrence S. Bloomberg Professor in Critical Care Nursing and is an assistant professor in the Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing at the University of Toronto, Canada. Leanne Redl is an infection control nurse in the intensive care unit at The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia.

Corresponding author: Louise Rose, Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Room 276, Toronto, ON M5T1P8, Canada (e-mail: louise.rose{at}utoronto).

Background Cuff management varies widely in Europe and North America. Little is known about current practice in Australia and New Zealand.

Objective To characterize important aspects of cuff management in intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand to compare with international reports.

Methods A questionnaire was sent to all nurse managers of adult intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand.

Results Survey response was 53% (92/175). After intubation, most units (50/92, 54%) used both minimal occlusive volume technique and cuff pressure measurement; 5 (5.5%) used these methods along with pilot balloon palpation. Twenty units (22%) used cuff pressure measurement exclusively and 16 units (17.5%) used the minimal occlusive volume technique exclusively. Only 1 unit (1%) used the minimal leak technique after intubation. For ongoing management, cuff pressure measurement was the preferred method, used exclusively in 42 units (46%), with the minimal occlusive volume technique used in 40 units (43%; sole method in 6 units [7%]) and palpation in 4 units (4%). In most units (65/92, 71%), cuffs were monitored once per nursing shift. In units using the minimal occlusive volume technique, oropharyngeal suctioning (74%) and semirecumbent positioning (58%) were routinely incorporated; sigh breaths (6%), discontinuation of enteral feeding (10%), and nasogastric tube aspiration (26%) were uncommon. Cuff management protocols (37%) and subglottic suctioning (12%) were used infrequently.

Conclusions Cuff pressure measurement was the preferred method, used exclusively or in combination with other methods. The minimal occlusive volume technique was used more often after intubation than for ongoing management.


Related articles in AJCC:

Clinical Pearls
Mary Jo Grap
AJCC 2008 17: 406. [Full Text]  





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.