AJCC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schulte, D.
Right arrow Articles by Dudley, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schulte, D.
Right arrow Articles by Dudley, W.
American Journal of Critical Care, Vol 2, Issue 2, 134-136
Copyright © 1993 by American Association of Critical Care Nurses


Articles

Pilot study of the relationship between heart rate and ectopy and unrestricted vs restricted visiting hours in the coronary care unit

DA Schulte, LO Burrell, SH Gueldner, MH Bramlett, B Fuszard, SK Stone, and WN Dudley .

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between cardiac performance (as measured by heart rate and ectopy) and unrestricted vs restricted visiting hours in the coronary care unit. DESIGN: Patients were from two coronary care units. Group A had unrestricted visiting hours, and group B had restricted visiting hours. Heart rate and ectopy were measured three times both in patients with unrestricted visiting hours and in those with restricted visiting hours: (1) before visitors arrived, (2) 5 minutes after visitors arrived and (3) 1 to 5 minutes after the visitors left. A total of 25 visits were analyzed. FINDINGS: There were no significant differences in rates of premature ventricular contractions and premature atrial contractions between the two groups. Patients with unrestricted visiting hours had a significantly lower heart rate after visits than patients with restricted visits. CONCLUSION: Consideration should be given to development of unrestricted visiting policies that promote the continuing presence and natural support of the family and significant others for patients in coronary care units.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Fumagalli, L. Boncinelli, A. Lo Nostro, P. Valoti, G. Baldereschi, M. Di Bari, A. Ungar, S. Baldasseroni, P. Geppetti, G. Masotti, et al.
Reduced Cardiocirculatory Complications With Unrestrictive Visiting Policy in an Intensive Care Unit: Results From a Pilot, Randomized Trial
Circulation, February 21, 2006; 113(7): 946 - 952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family NursingHome page
J. E. Hupcey and J. M. Morse
Family and Social Support: Application to the Critically I11 Patient
Journal of Family Nursing, August 1, 1995; 1(3): 257 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.