AJCC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Erickson, R.
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Erickson, R.
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, L.
American Journal of Critical Care, Vol 3, Issue 1, 40-54
Copyright © 1994 by American Association of Critical Care Nurses

Articles

Accuracy of infrared ear thermometry and other temperature methods in adults

RS Erickson and LT Meyer .

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of infrared ear-based temperature measurement in relation to thermometer, ear position, and other temperature methods, with pulmonary artery temperature as the reference. METHODS: Ear-based temperature measurements were made with four infrared thermometers, three in the core mode and two in the unadjusted mode, each with tug and no-tug techniques. Pulmonary artery, bladder (n = 21), and axillary temperatures were read after each ear-based measurement and oral temperature was measured once when possible (n = 32). Subjects consisted of a convenience sample of 50 patients with pulmonary artery catheters who were in adult critical care units of a university teaching hospital. RESULTS: Ear-based measurements correlated well with pulmonary artery temperature (r = .87 to .91), although closeness of agreement differed among thermometer-mode combinations (mean offsets = -0.7 to 0.5 degree C) and had moderately high variability between subjects (SD = +/- 0.5 degree C) with all instruments. Use of an ear tug either made no difference or resulted in slightly lower readings. Bladder temperature was nearly identical to pulmonary artery temperature values (r = .99, offset = 0.0 +/- 0.2 degree C). Oral readings were slightly lower (r = .78, offset = -0.2 degree C) and axillary readings much more so (r = .80 to .82, offset = -0.7 degree C); both were highly variable (SD = +/- 0.6 degree C) and affected by external factors. CONCLUSIONS: Infrared ear thermometry is useful for clinical temperature measurement as long as moderately high variability between patients is acceptable. Readings differ among thermometers, although several instruments provide values close to pulmonary artery temperature in adults. Readings are not higher with an ear tug. Bladder temperature substitutes well for pulmonary artery temperature, whereas oral and axillary values may be influenced by external factors in the critical care setting.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. A. Hannenberg and D. I. Sessler
Improving Perioperative Temperature Management
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2008; 107(5): 1454 - 1457.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Biol Res NursHome page
V. D. Hooper and J. O. Andrews
Accuracy of noninvasive core temperature measurement in acutely ill adults: the state of the science.
Biol Res Nurs, July 1, 2006; 8(1): 24 - 34.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
A S El-Radhi and W Barry
Thermometry in paediatric practice.
Arch. Dis. Child., April 1, 2006; 91(4): 351 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Crit CareHome page
W. M. Fallis
Monitoring Urinary Bladder Temperature in the Intensive Care Unit: State of the Science
Am. J. Crit. Care., January 1, 2002; 11(1): 38 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.