AJCC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Renner, L.
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Renner, L.
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, L.
American Journal of Critical Care, Vol 3, Issue 1, 55-61
Copyright © 1994 by American Association of Critical Care Nurses


Articles

Injectate port selection affects accuracy and reproducibility of cardiac output measurements with multiport thermodilution pulmonary artery catheters

LE Renner and LT Meyer .

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy and reproducibility of thermodilution cardiac output measurements obtained from the injectate and infusion ports of a multilumen pulmonary artery catheter. The thermodilution results were compared with an independent measure of flow obtained from an electromagnetic flow meter. METHODS: In an experimental study conducted at an animal research laboratory of a health sciences university, two virgin western breed ewes were surgically instrumented with an inferior vena cava occluder, which reduced venous return and thus lowered cardiac output, and an ascending aortic electromagnetic flow probe, which provided an independent reference measure of cardiac output. On the day of study, a multilumen pulmonary artery catheter was inserted. Cardiac output was manipulated over a range of 2.9 to 12.1 L/min with i.v. isoproterenol or inferior vena cava occlusion. Approximately 30 simultaneous thermodilution and electromagnetic flow meter measurements of cardiac output were obtained from both the infusion and injectate ports in each of the two subjects. RESULTS: Correlation coefficients were lower and standard error of the estimates was higher for the infusion port (r = .83; SEE = 1.19 L/min) vs the injectate port (r = .94; SEE = .74 L/min), indicating reduced reproducibility with infusion port thermodilution cardiac output determinations. Accuracy was also adversely influenced in the infusion port results. The linear regression for the infusion port data intercepted the Y axis at +2.64 L/min, indicating significant overestimation of cardiac output at flows of less than 5 L/min and underestimation of flow when cardiac output exceeded 8 L/min. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the infusion port for the measurement of thermodilution cardiac output measurements may result in nonreproducible and inaccurate results.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. G. Sakka, T. Hanusch, O. Thuemer, and K. Wegscheider
The Influence of Venovenous Renal Replacement Therapy on Measurements by the Transpulmonary Thermodilution Technique
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2007; 105(4): 1079 - 1082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.