|
|
||||||||
Articles |
BACKGROUND. The intensity and nature of a patient therapeutic plan should depend upon the specific therapeutic goals. When the therapeutic plan includes a do-not-resuscitate order, the intensity of the plan may be high or low. OBJECTIVE. To examine the differences in patient care requirements and hospital outcomes in patients with a do-not-resuscitate status to determine the most appropriate care setting, eg, intensive vs nonintensive care. METHOD. Data from a prospective sample of 100 patients were analyzed. Patients were grouped according to the intensity of the therapeutic plan: (1) all-but-CPR: all support except cardiopulmonary resuscitation, (2) conservative-care: medical management without the addition of life-sustaining measures, (3) comfort-only, and (4) withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. RESULTS. Patient mortality was high for all groups except the conservative-care group. Patient care requirements remained high in the all-but-CPR group, necessitating continued intensive care. Patient care requirements decreased significantly in the comfort-only and withdrawal groups, illustrating the ability to manage these patients in a nonintensive care setting.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y-Y Chen and S J Youngner "Allow natural death" is not equivalent to " do not resuscitate": a response. J. Med. Ethics, December 1, 2008; 34(12): 887 - 888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Campbell and J. A. Guzman Impact of a Proactive Approach to Improve End-of-Life Care in a Medical ICU Chest, January 1, 2003; 123(1): 266 - 271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |