AJCC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bainger, E.
Right arrow Articles by Fernsler, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bainger, E.
Right arrow Articles by Fernsler, J.
American Journal of Critical Care, Vol 4, Issue 1, 36-43
Copyright © 1995 by American Association of Critical Care Nurses


Articles

Perceived quality of life before and after implantation of an internal cardioverter defibrillator

EM Bainger and JI Fernsler .

BACKGROUND: Although use of the internal cardioverter defibrillator in selected high-risk patient groups has significantly improved survival, questions have arisen regarding its impact on psychological adjustment and quality of life. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there was a difference in perceived quality of life of internal cardioverter defibrillator recipients before implantation, reported retrospectively, and after implantation. METHODS: Survey packets containing a demographic data form, a modified version of the Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life Index: Cardiac Version, and a consent form were mailed to internal cardioverter defibrillator recipients accrued from two hospitals; 70 patients comprised the convenience sample. RESULTS: No significant difference in perceived overall quality of life was revealed by before and after implantation scores of t tests or analyses of variance. Young, unemployed patients with multiple health problems were most at risk for quality of life deficits. Overall, recipients in this study appeared to adapt effectively to the stresses associated with the device. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the internal cardioverter defibrillator did not prolong life at a sacrifice to quality of life. These findings can help identify patients at increased risk for quality of life deficits.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
S. A. Thomas, E. Friedmann, C.-W. Kao, P. Inguito, M. Metcalf, F. J. Kelley, and S. S. Gottlieb
Quality of life and psychological status of patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.
Am. J. Crit. Care., July 1, 2006; 15(4): 389 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
H. C. M. Kamphuis, J. R. J. de Leeuw, R. Derksen, R. N. W. Hauer, and J. A. M. Winnubst
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients: quality of life in recipients with and without ICD shock delivery: A prospective study
Europace, January 1, 2003; 5(4): 381 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
H. C. M. Kamphuis, J. R. J. De Leeuw, R. Derksen, R. Hauer, and J. A. M. Winnubst
A 12-month quality of life assessment of cardiac arrest survivors treated with or without an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Europace, January 1, 2002; 4(4): 417 - 425.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.