AJCC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kinney, M.
Right arrow Articles by Puntillo, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kinney, M.
Right arrow Articles by Puntillo, K.
American Journal of Critical Care, Vol 4, Issue 6, 419-424
Copyright © 1995 by American Association of Critical Care Nurses

Articles

Chest tube removal practices in critical care units in the United States

MR Kinney, KT Kirchhoff, and KA Puntillo .

BACKGROUND: Pain assessment and management are recognized as major problems in critical care settings. However, little is known about pain management practices related to medical procedures performed in the ICU, particularly removal of chest tubes. OBJECTIVES: To describe practices related to chest tube removal in the United States, with an emphasis on pain assessment and management. METHODS: A survey instrument was developed and mailed to 995 members of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses who cared for patients with chest tubes. They were asked about chest tube removal practices in their institutions. RESULTS: Chest tubes are removed primarily by physicians and house staff, although 11% of respondents reported that specially trained nurses removed the tubes. Only 16% indicated that a prescription for pain medication was routinely available before chest tube removal. The drug administered most frequently was intravenous morphine sulfate, but the dose varied considerably. Nurses were generally satisfied (65.6%) with practices related to chest tube removal in their unit; nurses who were not satisfied (34.4%) wished to see better pain management practices (45%), removal of tubes by the patient's assigned nurse (17.8%), a protocol for tube removal (13.9%), notification of the nurse before removal (12.2%), and other changes (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Practices associated with chest tube removal, especially pharmacologic management of procedure-related pain, vary in critical care units. Caregivers are advised to develop practice policies to guide decisions about management of acute pain in this patient population.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am J Crit CareHome page
K. Puntillo and S. J. Ley
Appropriately Timed Analgesics Control Pain Due to Chest Tube Removal
Am. J. Crit. Care., July 1, 2004; 13(4): 292 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Crit CareHome page
K. Puntillo
Pain Assessment and Management in the Critically Ill: Wizardry or Science?
Am. J. Crit. Care., July 1, 2003; 12(4): 310 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.