AJCC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meehan, D.
Right arrow Articles by Imperial, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Meehan, D.
Right arrow Articles by Imperial, F.
American Journal of Critical Care, Vol 4, Issue 6, 435-442
Copyright © 1995 by American Association of Critical Care Nurses


Articles

Analgesic administration, pain intensity, and patient satisfaction in cardiac surgical patients

DA Meehan, ME McRae, DA Rourke, C Eisenring, and FA Imperial .

BACKGROUND: Pain can adversely affect a patient's physiological and psychological recovery, yet little is known about the pain experience of cardiac surgical patients. OBJECTIVES: To examine nursing practice regarding analgesic administration and measure pain intensity and patient satisfaction with pain management practices. METHODS: To establish baseline nursing practice regarding analgesic administration, charts were reviewed retrospectively in 50 adult cardiac surgical patients, and the same information was collected concurrently for a prospective sample of 51 patients. The subjects completed visual analogue scales as a measure of pain intensity twice daily while in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit and Pain Relief Satisfaction Questionnaires on the day after transfer from the unit. RESULTS: Patients in the prospective group received significantly more analgesia. Pain intensity was moderate (4 or greater on the Visual Analogue Scale). Women had higher overall visual analogue scale scores than did men, 4.57 versus 3.70. Patients in whom an internal mammary artery had been used as a bypass graft had significantly higher scores compared with patients with vein grafts. The Pain Relief Satisfaction Questionnaire responses indicated that 96% of the patients experienced effective pain management in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit. CONCLUSIONS: Despite receiving analgesic doses twice those reported elsewhere for similar populations, the patients in this study reported moderate pain intensity. This finding was confounded by the fact that 96% expressed satisfaction with their pain management in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit. Frequent assessment and documentation of both pain and pain relief from interventions are necessary if the healthcare team is to implement an individualized analgesic regimen.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. A. Chaney
Intrathecal and Epidural Anesthesia and Analgesia for Cardiac Surgery
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2006; 102(1): 45 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
L. B. Milgrom, J. A. Brooks, R. Qi, K. Bunnell, S. Wuestefeld, and D. Beckman
Pain Levels Experienced With Activities After Cardiac Surgery
Am. J. Crit. Care., March 1, 2004; 13(2): 116 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.