AJCC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sanford, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sanford, M.
American Journal of Critical Care, Vol 6, Issue 1, 39-45
Copyright © 1997 by American Association of Critical Care Nurses


Articles

Rewarming cardiac surgical patients: warm water vs warm air

MM Sanford .

BACKGROUND: Hypothermia is experienced by 60% to 90% of adult patients after surgery. The detrimental physiological consequences of prolonged hypothermia are a significant risk for cardiac surgical patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of a warmed convective-air blanket with that of a warmed circulating-water blanket on the rates of increase in skin and core temperatures and on total rewarming time in patients with hypothermia after cardiac surgery. METHODS: A quasi-experimental, repeated-measures design was used to study rewarming in 76 adult patients who were hypothermic after cardiac surgery. Subjects were randomized to two groups: 40 were warmed with a convective-air blanket; 36, with a circulating-water blanket. Skin and core temperatures were recorded every 15 minutes until the subject's pulmonary artery temperature reached 37 degrees C. Total time required for rewarming was the period between time of placement of the blanket and time of removal. The effects of 13 other variables on the time required for rewarming were also determined. RESULTS: Both skin and core temperatures increased more rapidly in patients treated with the warm circulating-water blanket than in those treated with the convective-air blanket. The mean time required for rewarming was 45 minutes shorter in the group treated with the circulating-water blanket. The patient's age, volume of i.v. fluids received, length of anesthesia, starting core temperature, and treatment method had significant effects on the time required for rewarming. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that rewarming with a circulating-water blanket produces normothermia more rapidly than rewarming with a warm convective-air blanket in adult patients who are hypothermic after cardiac surgery.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
E. B. Rein, M. Filtvedt, L. Walloe, and J. C. Raeder
Hypothermia during laparotomy can be prevented by locally applied warm water and pulsating negative pressure
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2007; 98(3): 331 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
A. Brauer, M. J.M. English, N. Steinmetz, N. Lorenz, T. Perl, W. Weyland, and M. Quintel
Efficacy of forced-air warming systems with full body blankets: [Efficacite des systemes de chauffage a air pulse avec des couvertures a champ complet]
Can J Anesth, January 1, 2007; 54(1): 34 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.