AJCC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Craney, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rankin, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Craney, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rankin, S
American Journal of Critical Care, Vol 6, Issue 6, 445-451
Copyright © 1997 by American Association of Critical Care Nurses


Articles

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators: physical and psychosocial outcomes

JM Craney, CL Mandle, BH Munro, and S Rankin .

BACKGROUND: The long-term outcomes of living with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator are an important consideration in recovery. However, little is known about physical and psychosocial outcomes beyond 1 year after implantation. OBJECTIVE: To describe the long-term physical and psychosocial adaptation of persons who have had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator for approximately 2 years or more. METHODS: This nonexperimental cross-sectional study used telephone interviews to ascertain the responses of 80 recipients of implantable cardioverter defibrillators to physical and psychosocial questionnaires to explore the long-term outcomes of living with the devices. Subjects eligible for inclusion were selected from the files of an arrhythmia clinic. RESULTS: Hierarchical regression analysis showed that subjects who are not emotional are likely to be more physically active, especially if they are young and male, and that subjects who tend to be emotional are likely to be psychologically distressed and have poorer social and domestic adaptation. Furthermore, use of emotions was a positive predictor of psychological distress and poor social and domestic adaptation. Subjects reported the use of both emotion- and problem-focused coping. Subjects' scores on physical and psychosocial functioning were comparable to scores reported in the literature for patients who have had myocardial infarction or dysrhythmia. CONCLUSIONS: Emotional responses to distress were predictive of little physical activity and psychological distress. Furthermore, young recipients of implantable cardioverter defibrillators and men were predicted to be physically active. Persons who have had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator for approximately 2 years or more can anticipate that their physical and psychosocial functioning will be similar to that of patients who have myocardial infarction or dysrhythmia.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
S. B. Dunbar
Psychosocial Issues of Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
Am. J. Crit. Care., July 1, 2005; 14(4): 294 - 303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
S. S. Dickerson
Redefining Life While Forestalling Death: Living with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator after a Sudden Cardiac Death Experience
Qual Health Res, March 1, 2002; 12(3): 360 - 372.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
H. C. M. Kamphuis, J. R. J. De Leeuw, R. Derksen, R. Hauer, and J. A. M. Winnubst
A 12-month quality of life assessment of cardiac arrest survivors treated with or without an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Europace, January 1, 2002; 4(4): 417 - 425.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.