AJCC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carroll, K.
Right arrow Articles by Glaser, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Carroll, K.
Right arrow Articles by Glaser, D.
American Journal of Critical Care, Vol 8, Issue 2, 105-117
Copyright © 1999 by American Association of Critical Care Nurses

Articles

Pain assessment and management in critically ill postoperative and trauma patients: a multisite study

KC Carroll, PJ Atkins, GR Herold, CA Mlcek, M Shively, P Clopton, and DN Glaser .

BACKGROUND: Pain in critically ill patients is undertreated. OBJECTIVES: To examine patients' perceptions of pain and acute pain management practices in a large metropolitan area to provide direction for improvements in pain relief. METHODS: In a descriptive, correlational study, data were collected from 213 patients in 13 hospitals. Interviews with patients, chart reviews, and interviews with nurse leaders were used to examine institutional and individual approaches to pain management. RESULTS: Twenty-eight percent of patients did not recall an explanation of a pain management plan, and 64% were often in moderate to severe pain while in the intensive care unit. High pain intensity correlated with wait for an analgesic (P < .001), expectations of less pain (P < .001), and longer stay in the intensive care unit (P < .001). Low satisfaction correlated with expectations of less pain (P < .001), often being in moderate to severe pain (P < .001), and long wait for an analgesic (P < .001). In the first 24 hours postoperatively, only 54% of patients had a numerical pain rating documented; 91% had a pain description. The amount of opioid given on postoperative day 1 was influenced by pain intensity (P < .001), the patient's age (P = .03), type of surgery (P = .002), and route of analgesic (P < .001). Only 33% of patients had nonpharmacological pain interventions documented. CONCLUSIONS: Despite moderate to severe pain, patients are generally satisfied with their pain relief. Measuring patients' satisfaction alone is not a reliable outcome for determining the effectiveness of pain management. Realistic expectations of patients about their pain may enhance coping, increase satisfaction, and decrease pain intensity after surgery.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M.-C. Taillefer, M. Carrier, S. Belisle, S. Levesque, H. Lanctot, A.-M. Boisvert, and M. Choiniere
Prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of chronic nonanginal postoperative pain after a cardiac operation: A cross-sectional study
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2006; 131(6): 1274 - 1280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Crit CareHome page
C. Gelinas, M. Fortier, C. Viens, L. Fillion, and K. Puntillo
Pain Assessment and Management in Critically Ill Intubated Patients: a Retrospective Study
Am. J. Crit. Care., March 1, 2004; 13(2): 126 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Crit CareHome page
J. Reimer-Kent
From Theory to Practice: Preventing Pain After Cardiac Surgery
Am. J. Crit. Care., March 1, 2003; 12(2): 136 - 143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.