AJCC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Metheny, N.
Right arrow Articles by Wunderlich, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Metheny, N.
Right arrow Articles by Wunderlich, R.
American Journal of Critical Care, Vol 8, Issue 3, 160-167
Copyright © 1999 by American Association of Critical Care Nurses


Articles

A survey of bedside methods used to detect pulmonary aspiration of enteral formula in intubated tube-fed patients

NA Metheny, MA Aud, and RJ Wunderlich .

BACKGROUND: The most frequently recommended methods to assess for pulmonary aspiration of enteral formula in intubated, tube-fed patients are (1) adding dye to enteral formulas and observing for dye-stained tracheal secretions and (2) testing tracheal secretions with glucose oxidase reagent strips to detect the presence of glucose-rich formula. Reportedly, the glucose method is more sensitive than the dye method, and the dye method may have greater potential for harm. It is not known if this information has resulted in wider use of the glucose method in practice settings. OBJECTIVES: To describe the frequency with which nurses in intensive care units use the dye and glucose methods to detect pulmonary aspiration of enteral formula in tube-fed, intubated patients. METHODS: One registered nurse in the medical intensive care unit at 285 acute-care facilities was contacted by telephone and asked about the methods used to detect pulmonary aspiration of enteral formula in tube-fed, intubated adult patients. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 281 facilities. More than 73% of the respondents reported using only the dye method; about 1% reported using only the glucose method. Approximately 13% used both methods; another 13% did not use either method. CONCLUSIONS: The dye method is used far more often than is the glucose method. Two probable reasons are that the dye method is easier to implement, and it is recommended in commonly used basic nursing textbooks.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.