AJCC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Besserman, E
Right arrow Articles by Ngo, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Besserman, E
Right arrow Articles by Ngo, D
American Journal of Critical Care, Vol 8, Issue 3, 170-179
Copyright © 1999 by American Association of Critical Care Nurses


Articles

Use of flexible intermediate and intensive care to reduce multiple transfers of patients

E Besserman, D Teres, A Logan, M Brennan, S Cleaves, R Bayly, D Brochis, B Nemeth, J Grare, and D Ngo .

OBJECTIVE: To test an alternative flexible approach to traditional fixed intermediate and intensive care to minimize transfers of patients. METHODS: Patients admitted to a 28-bed nursing unit with intermediate care potential and a 12-bed intensive care unit at a 300-bed teaching community hospital were studied. The group included 524 patients with a discharge diagnosis code for mechanical ventilation. During eight 3-week cycles, 1073 transfers of patients were tabulated. A plan-do-study-act method was used to improve weaning from mechanical ventilation and reduce the number of inappropriate days in intensive care. Admissions and transfers to the 2 units for all patients during the eight 3-week cycles were compared over time. Length of stay and mortality were noted for all patients treated with conventional and noninvasive ventilation. RESULTS: Direct admissions to the flexible intermediate unit increased with no overall change in admissions to the intensive care unit. Fewer patients needed conventional ventilation, and more in both units were treated with noninvasive ventilation. The median number of transfers per patient treated with mechanical ventilation decreased from 1.94 to 1.20. Length of stay and mortality also decreased among such patients. Some cost savings were attributable to the decrease in the number of transfers. Transfers out of the hospital directly from the intensive care unit increased from 2.24% to 4.43%. CONCLUSIONS: In a community teaching hospital, flexible care policies decreased the number of in-hospital transfers of patients treated with mechanical ventilation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
N. Conlon, B. O'Brien, G. P. Herbison, and B. Marsh
Long-term functional outcome and performance status after intensive care unit re-admission: a prospective survey
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2008; 100(2): 219 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
A. L. Hendrich, J. Fay, and A. K. Sorrells
Effects of Acuity-Adaptable Rooms on Flow of Patients and Delivery of Care
Am. J. Crit. Care., January 1, 2004; 13(1): 35 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.