AJCC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, K.
American Journal of Critical Care, Vol 8, Issue 6, 389-396
Copyright © 1999 by American Association of Critical Care Nurses


Articles

Change in quality of life after lung volume reduction surgery

KL Anderson .

BACKGROUND: Lung volume reduction surgery has been reintroduced for treatment of severe emphysema. Goals of this surgery are to decrease dyspnea, increase exercise tolerance, and improve quality of life. OBJECTIVES: To describe the effect of lung volume reduction surgery on overall quality of life, disease severity, dyspnea, and functional status during the first 12 months after surgery. METHODS: Data were collected for 20 patients (mean age, 63 years; 15 men) before and 3, 6, and 12 months after lung volume reduction surgery. Disease severity was determined by percentage of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (compared with established norms); functional status, by a 6-minute walk test; dyspnea, by scores on a visual analog scale; and overall quality of life, by scores on the Quality of Life Scale. RESULTS: Scores on the Quality of Life Scale and distance walked increased significantly after surgery, and these increases were maintained at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Percentage of forced expiratory volume in 1 second increased significantly 3 months after surgery, but changes at 6 and 12 months were not significant. Changes in dyspnea ratings were not significant. No pattern of correlations among study variables was significant. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life and functional status are improved after lung volume reduction surgery. Because none of the physiological variables were related to changes in quality of life, alternative explanations for these improvements must be explored in future studies.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
J. Hamacher, S. Buchi, C.L. Georgescu, U. Stammberger, R. Thurnheer, K.E. Bloch, W. Weder, and E.W. Russi
Improved quality of life after lung volume reduction surgery
Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2002; 19(1): 54 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.