AJCC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Critical Care. 2002;11: 397-399

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adams, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Pelter, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Adams, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Pelter, M. M.

ECG PUZZLER
The ECG Puzzler that appeared in the May 2002 issue of the American Journal of Critical Care contained incorrect ECG figures. The corrected ECG Puzzler is published below.

Reperfusion Arrhythmias

By Mary G. Adams, RN, PhD and Michele M. Pelter, RN, PhD. From the School of Nursing, the State University of New York at Buffalo (MGA) and Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, Calif (MMP).

Scenario: A 64-year-old male is in the holding room of the adult cardiac catheterization laboratory following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for treatment of acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (MI). The procedure went well; however, while he was awaiting transfer to the coronary care unit, this rhythm occurs. The patient’s blood pressure is stable (110/70), he has no complaints of chest pain, and he is alert and oriented.

For every ECG, we recommend you systematically examine the following 8 features (check all that apply):



View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
 



View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
 
Interpretation: Ventricular tachycardia versus accelerated idioventricular rhythm (AIVR).

Rationale

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is an arrhythmia originating from an ectopic focus within the ventricular myocardium. In the above example, the rhythm is monomorphic because it is regular and originating from a single focus resulting in identical QRS complexes. No absolute ECG criteria exist for establishing the presence of VT. However, several ECG features suggest VT, including the following:

In this example, it is difficult to identify P waves because of the rapid ventricular rate. Hence, the presence or absence of AV dissociation cannot be determined. In addition, evaluation of ischemia is difficult because during VT the defection of the ST segment is deviated opposite the QRS complex. Hence, the ST-segment depression observed in V1 is expected and therefore is not considered ischemia. However, the ventricular rate, QRS width, and morphological criteria in V1 suggest that this rhythm is VT.

One type of VT is AIVR, which is sometimes termed slow VT since the ventricular rate is between 60–110 beats per minute. The onset of AIVR is typically nonparoxysmal (gradual) and results when the ventricular rate exceeds the sinus rate because of a slowing sinus rate, or sinoatrial (SA) or AV block. AIVR may occur following successful treatment of acute MI (primary PCI, or thrombolytics) once reperfusion is restored in the infarct-related artery. Although the ventricular rate in this example exceeds the criteria for AIVR, given that the patient had just been treated with PCI for acute ST elevation MI, AIVR is most likely.

Nursing Actions to Consider

Management is determined by a patient’s response to the arrhythmia. Specifically, is the patient hemodynamically stable? Therapy for AIVR is often unnecessary because the heart rate is slower than that of sustained VT with rapid ventricular response. Symptomatic patients should be treated promptly following current Advanced Cardiac Life Support guidelines in order to restore perfusion and avoid the development of ventricular fibrillation. This patient should be monitored closely for further arrhythmias and hemodynamic compromise.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Respond to This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adams, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Pelter, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Adams, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Pelter, M. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS